1. This Board Rocks has been split into two separate forums.

    The Preps Forum section was moved here to stand on its own. All member accounts are the same here as they were at ThisBoardRocks.

    The rest of ThisBoardRocks is located at: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    Welcome to the new Preps Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

You make the call #3

Discussion in 'Softball Forum' started by cmmguy, Apr 21, 2012.

  1. cmmguy

    cmmguy *

    Posts:
    645
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2006
    1 out
    R1 on First.
    Batter hits ball directly towards 2nd basemen who is playing about 5 feet behind the baseline.
    R1 leaps over the path of the ball but never touches the ball and never touches the second basemen - no contact of any kind.
    The 2nd basement stops her advancement towards the ball because of the runner and in fact bobbles the ball partly due to losing track of the ball while R1 jumps over it. But NO CONTACT. It was the fielder's choice to stop.

    Umpire calls R1 out for obstruction. Is he correct?
     
  2. chachacha

    chachacha Full Access Member

    Posts:
    433
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2006
    There does not have to be contact in order to call obstruction. I would say he/she was OK in calling the play the way he/she did.
     
  3. Coachwho

    Coachwho Junior Member

    Posts:
    29
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2008
    Location:
    Fayetteville NC
    Obstruction

    That same situation happen to my team the CALL is WRONG there is NO OBSTRUCTION the runner also has the right to run through the baseline as long they do not touch the fielder or the ball
     
  4. chachacha

    chachacha Full Access Member

    Posts:
    433
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2006
    I believe you are wrong concerning high
    school rules.
     
  5. chachacha

    chachacha Full Access Member

    Posts:
    433
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2006
    This is the spirit of the rule: "Runner’s interference occurs anytime the runner’s actions interfere with the defense’s ability to make a play on the ball. If, in the umpire’s judgment, the runner unintentionally interferes with a fielder attempting to field a ball in fair or foul territory, or with the fielder’s throw, then the runner is out."
     
  6. currylib

    currylib Junior Member

    Posts:
    23
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2008
    Same situation

    We recently had the same situation. The difference for us was that the 2nd baseman and the runner did collide. Ball was lost and bobbled around in the confusion.
    Like the situation above, the fielder stopped. We were told that had she continued in her fielding motion, interference was the call. But since she stopped her motion , there was no interference and the runner was safe.
    It would seem that physical contact is not the deciding factor, but movement is.
    BTW, this was high school ball as well.
     
    Last edited: Apr 22, 2012
  7. cmmguy

    cmmguy *

    Posts:
    645
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2006
    Forgot to say the organization level was a college game.
     
  8. rhughes18

    rhughes18 umpire

    Posts:
    205
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 27, 2009
    Location:
    Lewisville
    This is a had to be there call.

    If the fielder had to stop, hesitate or alter her attempt at the batted ball to keep from running into the (runner) then interference should be ruled.

    It is always best for the fielder to make contact with the runner that way judgement is not necessary in making this call.

    Contact is not required to have interference, but it sure makes it an easier call to make.
     
    Last edited: Apr 24, 2012

Share This Page